HyperX QuadCast vs HyperX SoloCast
Side-by-side comparison of two usb microphones options. Tap either name to open the full product page.
Our Pick
HyperX SoloCast
The HyperX SoloCast edges out the HyperX QuadCast with significantly more reviews (28,900 vs 21,300), a lower price ($40 vs $70). It delivers better value for most buyers.
Quick verdict
- Cheaper: HyperX SoloCast at $40 (saves $30)
- Same star rating on both.
- More market validation: HyperX SoloCast · 28,900 reviews
Feature-by-feature comparison
| Feature | HyperX QuadCast | HyperX SoloCast |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $70 | $40 |
| Rating | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Reviews | 21,300 | 28,900 |
| Value score | 27.8 | 50.2 |
| Recent purchases | 10K+ | 20K+ |
| Key specs | 4 patterns, RGB, shock mount, gain | Cardioid, tap mute, USB-C, compact |
| Ideal use | Streaming multi-pattern | Gaming + quick calls |
Value score = (rating x log(reviews)) / price. Higher is better.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between the HyperX QuadCast and HyperX SoloCast?
The HyperX QuadCast is priced at $70 with a 4.5/5 rating from 21,300 reviews. The HyperX SoloCast is priced at $40 with a 4.5/5 rating from 28,900 reviews. Key specs: HyperX QuadCast — 4 patterns, RGB, shock mount, gain. HyperX SoloCast — Cardioid, tap mute, USB-C, compact.
Which is cheaper, the HyperX QuadCast or the HyperX SoloCast?
The HyperX SoloCast is cheaper at $40, compared to $70 for the other model. The price difference is $30.
Which has better reviews, the HyperX QuadCast or the HyperX SoloCast?
Both models share the same 4.5/5 rating.
Which usb microphones should I buy — the HyperX QuadCast or the HyperX SoloCast?
It depends on your use case. The HyperX QuadCast is ideal for: Streaming multi-pattern. The HyperX SoloCast is ideal for: Gaming + quick calls. If budget is the deciding factor, the HyperX SoloCast is the more affordable option.
Looking at other options? Browse the full usb microphones catalog or see the comparison index.